WebbThe court ruled that although the record reflected that both Eisenberg and Hall mistakenly assumed at the time of the transactions that the items at issue were ancient, issues of … WebbToker v. Westerman See Frostifresh Corp. v. Reynoso, 52 Misc.2d 26, 274 N.Y.S.2d 757 (Sup.Ct. 1966), rev'd on other grounds, 54… Star Credit Corp. v. Ingram Plaintiff devised a refrigerator food plan sales scheme, permeated with fraudulent representations, grossly… 11 Citing Cases Case Details Full title:STAR CREDIT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v.
D.C. Circuit Finds No Proximate Cause in Patent Attorney …
WebbIn Toker v. Perl, 103 N.J. Super. 500 (Law Div. 1968), the price of a freezer to the buyer was more than two and one half times its maximum value. Summary of this case from Kugler v. Romain See 2 Summaries Opinion Decided November 13, 1968. Mr. Charles B. Turner,attorney for plaintiffs. Webbdefensible and explained American case law, but also that writers in the Aristotelian tradition understood the principle of equality in exchange in much the same way. ... Toker v. Westerman, 274 A.2d 78 (N.J. Super. Ct. 1970); Frostifresh Corp. v. Reynoso, 274 N.Y.S.2d 757 (1966). 9. Post v. Jones, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 150 (1856). christmas pajama party outfits
Toker v. Perl, 108 N.J. Super. 129 Casetext Search + Citator
http://www.kentlaw.edu/faculty/rwarner/classes/contracts/unconscionability/index.htm WebbToker v. Westerman, 113 N.J. Super. 452, 454, 274 A.2d 78, 80 (1970). The court found a price of two and half times a reasonable retail value particularly shocking where a dealer had less overhead because the dealer did not maintain a store. Id. WebbCase Summary Parties: Plaintiff: Toker (on assignment from People’s Foods of New Jersey) Defendant: Westerman Facts: Westerman (D) bought a refrigerator from … get graphics card info linux